home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TeX 1995 July
/
TeX CD-ROM July 1995 (Disc 1)(Walnut Creek)(1995).ISO
/
tex-k
/
tex-k-archive.past
/
tex-k-archive.gz
/
tex-k-archive
/
000018_karl@cs.umb.edu_Fri Oct 1 02:57:43 1993.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1994-10-11
|
1KB
Received: from terminus.cs.umb.edu by cs.umb.edu with SMTP id AA23939
(5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for <tex-k-exp@cs.umb.edu>); Fri, 1 Oct 1993 07:01:38 -0400
Received: by terminus.cs.umb.edu id AA12166
(5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for tex-k); Fri, 1 Oct 1993 06:57:43 -0400
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1993 06:57:43 -0400
From: "K. Berry" <karl@cs.umb.edu>
Message-Id: <199310011057.AA12166@terminus.cs.umb.edu>
To: andreas@mpa-garching.mpg.de
Subject: Re: include in Makefiles
Cc: tex-k@cs.umb.edu
I'd love to use include, but although it works on
sun, ibmr, sgi, and cray (as well as a lot of others,
and as well as anything with GNU make) it does not
work on everything, and I fear the number of
complaints would be quite numerous. Ghostscript
used include in its early days and people were
quite unhappy.
That said, maybe things have changed --
let me take a poll. If the make you use to compile
the -k programs doesn't support `include', please
send me mail with something like `includeless make'
in the subject line.